SUBMIT AN ABSTRACT
We invite you to submit an abstract for consideration in the 2025 Service Users in Academia Symposium programme. Please align your abstract with the theme or subthemes of the symposium. Abstracts may be presented as either a 30-minute presentation or a 60 minute ‘World Café’ session. You are welcome to submit multiple abstracts for consideration. Please note the following information.
The closing date for abstract submissions is Monday 31st March 2025.
All abstracts must be submitted using the abstract submission form. Please see information about submitting your abstract in the drop-down section below.
Abstracts will be reviewed after the closing date and you will be advised of the status of your abstract on 1st June, 2025.
Once an abstract has been submitted via email, an acknowledgement email will be sent to the submitting author. If this email is not received, please first check the spam folder, then contact the symposium organisers via email and email to suas@outlook.co.nz.
All accepted presenters are responsible for their own registration fees, travel and accommodation.
ABSTRACT FORMAT AND SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Please read the following guidelines before submitting your abstract.
Types of Sessions
There are two types of session format for you to select from.
Oral Presentations: Presentations are allocated 30 minutes each, including 20 minutes for the presentation and 10 minutes for questions from the audience. A data projector will be available for showing PowerPoint slides or other visual media.
World Café sessions: These sessions are 60 minutes in length. The session should be interactive and include opportunities for group discussion related to research findings, lived experience practice or a hot topic or pressing issue. It is recommended that a brief 10-minute presentation is provided to introduce the topic, followed by 40 minutes of small group discussion or activities. A further 10 minutes could be allocated at the end for summarising and closing the session.
Abstract Content and Format
Please ensure you have compiled all the below information in the abstract submission form
-
Abstract title of up to 20 words
-
Abstract up to 300 words
-
All author details, including organisation, job title, country and email address
-
Presenter/s 150-word biographical paragraph
Suggested Abstract Format:
Abstracts should be readable, clear and concise and follow the relevant format below. Unfamiliar terms and acronyms should be defined at first mention. Please check spelling and grammar as accepted abstracts will be included in the symposium programme online.
Suggested Abstract Format for Presentations (Research focus)
-
Study background and aim/s
-
Methods
-
Results/Findings
-
Conclusion
Suggested Abstract Format for Presentations (Non-research focus)
-
Topic introduction and background
-
Session aim or objectives
-
Session content (outline the key information or ideas to be presented)
-
Conclusion (including significance of the presentation content)
Suggested Abstract Format for World Café
-
Topic introduction and background
-
Session aim/s or objectives
-
Session plan (outline the interactive activities or discussions participants will engage in)
-
Conclusion (including potential significance of the discussion outcomes)
Abstract Submission
The closing date for abstract submissions is Monday 31st March 2025.
All abstracts must be submitted using the abstract submission form. Submit the completed form by email to suas@outlook.co.nz
Once an abstract has been submitted via email, an acknowledgement email will be sent to the submitting author. If this email is not received, please first check the spam folder, then contact the symposium organisers via email and email to suas@outlook.co.nz
Abstract Review Criteria
Abstracts will be reviewed after the closing date, and you will be advised of the status of your abstract on 1st June, 2025.
The goal for abstract peer review is to assure programme quality, and that all presentations include lived experience expertise and align with the stated themes and subthemes.
Each abstract is reviewed using standardised criteria, which will enable the committee to evaluate submissions in consistent way. The abstract reviewers will not have access to the author’s name and affiliations. The following criteria will be used to determine suitability.
-
How relevant is the topic to lived experience expertise and the symposium themes?
-
How well described are the background and objectives for the session?
-
How relevant and well described are the: methodology/methods for research focused presentations OR discussion content for non-research focused sessions?
-
How clear and appropriate are the: results and conclusions for presentations OR format of activities for World Café sessions?
-
How topical and innovative is the submission?
SYMPOSIUM THEME AND SUB-THEMES
The theme of the event is taken from the whakatauākī by Sir Hemi Henare
'Kua tawhiti kē tō haerenga mai, kia kore e haere tonu. He nui rawa ō mahi kia kore e mahi tonu'
'We have come too far not to go further. We have done too much not to do more'.
We have proudly embraced this whakatauakī that speaks to perseverance, endurance, and dedication in pursuit of our goals and aspirations. It encourages us to never give up on the future we want to see. Now more than ever, this whakatauakī is a reminder to us all that, no matter what, the work must go on.
Our sub-themes have been carefully selected to support the evolution of Peer and other Lived Experience expertise in academia.
As part of our call for speakers, we seek speakers who can help us discuss the following:
1. Looking back and looking forward
-
A stock-take of where we are at and how we got there
-
Where we will be in 10 years’ time.
-
Mapping fault lines and building foundations for lived experience in academia.
-
Untangling knots and weaving new threads for lived experience in academia.
Abstract topics
-
Lived Experience-Led Research - Transforming mental health systems through innovative research approaches.
-
Curriculum Innovations: Incorporating lived experience into mental health education and peer support roles
Co-creation workshops
-
Reimagining SUAS (rebranding co-design)
-
CPSLE – our future workforce??
2. Bridging the gaps: Equity, diversity and inclusion.
-
Formally ‘University challenged (AKA laying down the wero for Universities)’.
-
What can academia offer service users today?
-
What does lived experience have to do with academia?
-
Making academia a more welcoming place for lived experience.
-
Bringing the wisdom of lived experience into academia.
-
Being in academia when unwell.
-
Moving beyond tokenism.
-
Tensions and alliances between academia and lived experience.
-
The place of allyship.
Abstract topics
-
Creating culturally safe spaces in academic settings
-
Celebrating lived experience diversity in academia. Successes and challenges.
-
Valuing and empowering indigenous knowledge systems in academia and research
3. Lived experience expertise and research methodology
-
Lived experience data sovereignty.
-
LE research priorities.
-
Methodological considerations & approaches to LE research.
Abstract topics
-
Lived Experience data sovereignty
-
Peer, Lived Experience Research
-
Approaches to Lived Experience Research


